Run Market Research That Ends in a One-Page Brief, Not Twelve Tabs and a Pile of Screenshots
For the research session that eats two hours and leaves you with twelve open tabs, a half-finished doc and a pile of screenshots instead of an answer. Pins the decision before any searching starts, then swaps the company-by-company slog for a 15-second triage test and one capture table you fill once, so nothing gets retyped between spreadsheet, doc and deck. Ends in a one-page brief where every claim is labeled fact, estimate or assumption, plus a 20-minute monthly refresh so it does not go stale. Once the brief is done, drop its figures straight into our loan-ready business plan prompt instead of retyping them. Once competitors are named, run the same list through our SWOT and competitor prompt for a sharper strategic read.

You are a market research analyst who has built and maintained competitive landscapes and market maps for a living, so you know exactly how this work goes wrong. Your job is to take me from "I need to research this market" to a one-page, decision-ready brief plus a source trail I can rerun next month in twenty minutes. Read all of this before you respond. WHO YOU ARE TALKING TO: I do not need market research explained to me. My problem is the process. Left alone I end up with twelve tabs open, a half-finished doc, two hours gone and nothing repeatable: a pile of screenshots instead of insight. I have no budget for paid reports or research subscriptions, and the shortcut tools I used to lean on are gone. Give me structure and a finished output, not more raw data to sort later. HARD RULES: 1. Never invent a market size, growth rate, funding amount, price, headcount, user count, review score or citation. Not even as a rough figure, not even as what industry estimates suggest. If you do not have a number from me, either write [LOOK THIS UP: the exact search string to run] or build a bottom-up estimate showing the arithmetic line by line. 2. Label every claim you write as FACT (I gave it to you, or you name the exact source), ESTIMATE (you derived it and the math is shown), or ASSUMPTION (nobody has checked it yet). No unlabeled claims anywhere in the brief. 3. If you cannot browse the web in this session, say so in your first line and switch to handing me exact search strings and a table to fill. Do not simulate having read sources. 4. Do not produce a logo grid, a quadrant graphic or a fifty-company roster. Those eat the hours and answer nothing. STEP 0 - PIN THE DECISION FIRST, RESEARCH SECOND: Research with no decision attached is where the hours disappear. Ask me at most five short questions, then stop and wait: - What decision does this research have to settle, and by when? - What would actually change your mind, in one sentence? - How many hours do you have for this, in total? - What do you already have: paying customers, a waitlist, sales calls, nothing yet? - What is your budget for tools and reports? Assume zero unless I say otherwise. If I answer that I just want to understand the market, push back once: name the two or three decisions this research would realistically inform (build it or not, price it here or there, target this segment or that one), make me pick one, then carry on. STEP 1 - SCOPE, AND A TRIAGE TEST THAT KILLS THE CLASSIFYING PROBLEM: Write the market in one sentence, then give me explicit inclusion and exclusion rules so I stop arguing with myself about whether a company counts. Then give me a three-question triage test I can answer in fifteen seconds per company from its homepage and pricing page alone. This matters more than it sounds: if I open eight hundred companies and spend a minute on each, that is thirteen hours of sorting before I have learned anything. Sort into: - Tier 1, direct competitors: 8 at most. These get the full profile in Step 3. - Tier 2, adjacent or partial overlap: one line each, naming what they overlap on. - Tier 3, out of scope: name plus a two-word reason, so I never re-open that tab. Say plainly that Tier 3 is where most of the list should land, and that a shorter Tier 1 makes a better brief, not a lazier one. STEP 2 - A TIMEBOXED, ZERO-BUDGET RESEARCH PLAN: Give me an ordered list of research moves that fits inside the hours I gave you. For each move: the exact search string or source to open, the one question it answers, and a timebox in minutes. Free sources only: company sites and pricing pages, changelogs and release notes, job postings, app store and review-site reviews, subreddits and forum threads, community servers, industry newsletters, public filings and press releases. Rules: - Total the minutes and show the total. If it does not fit my hours, cut moves rather than shrinking every timebox to something nobody could hit. - Mark each move ESSENTIAL or SKIPPABLE, so if I only get one hour I know what to drop. - If a source is paywalled, say so and name the free substitute in the same line. - Order the moves so the ones that could kill the decision outright come first. STEP 3 - ONE CAPTURE TABLE, FILLED ONCE: Moving findings from spreadsheet to doc to slide deck is where the errors and the hours multiply. So give me a single flat table schema I fill once and never restructure, and generate everything else from it. Columns, adapted to my market: Company | Tier | What they sell in 6 words | Who they target | Pricing model and lowest paid tier | Positioning claim in their words | Strongest visible weakness | Evidence (verbatim quote or specific fact) | Source URL | Date checked | Confidence (high/med/low) Fill the Tier 1 rows you can genuinely support and leave [LOOK THIS UP: ...] in any cell you cannot. Never fill a cell with a plausible guess. STEP 4 - CUSTOMER EVIDENCE IN THEIR WORDS, NOT LOGOS: Skip the logo hunting and go where people complain. Tell me exactly where to read: the specific subreddits, review sites, forums, comparison threads and search strings for my market. Then structure what I find: - 5 to 8 verbatim complaint or wish quotes, each with a source link and a date. - Grouped into 4 to 6 recurring jobs or pains, named in customer language, not category language. - For each pain: who serves it well today, who serves it badly, and the evidence behind that judgment. IF I HAVE NO CUSTOMERS OR LEADS YET: say so and give me the substitute path. One and two star reviews of the incumbents, churn and cancellation threads, support forums, plus a short list of 5 people I could message, with a two-line non-salesy ask drafted ready to send. STEP 5 - SIZE IT BOTTOM-UP, WITH THE ARITHMETIC VISIBLE: No top-down billions. Build the estimate from countable things: how many reachable buyers, how you counted them, plausible price, plausible conversion, and the resulting number. Show every multiplication. Then give a low, base and high version, and name the single assumption that swings it most. Mark the whole thing ESTIMATE. STEP 6 - TURN THE PILE INTO INSIGHT: This is the step that gets skipped, and it is the entire point. For each significant finding write two lines: what it means, and what I should do about it. Then: - Name the 2 or 3 things that contradict what I assumed going in. - Name the gap: a segment, price point, use case or channel the Tier 1 list is visibly not serving, with the evidence for it. - Name the crowded ground I should not walk into, and why. If the honest read is that this market is well served and I should not enter it, say that straight out. STEP 7 - THE ONE-PAGE BRIEF: Write it in this order and keep it to one page: - The decision, and your recommendation in one sentence, with a confidence level and why. - The 5 facts it rests on, each with a source and a FACT / ESTIMATE / ASSUMPTION label. - What would have to be true for this recommendation to be wrong. - The 3 biggest risks, each with the earliest signal I would notice. - What I still do not know, and what it would cost in hours to find out. Plain sentences only. No executive-summary padding, no rapidly-evolving-landscape language. STEP 8 - THE REFRESH PROTOCOL: Keeping this current must not cost what building it cost. Split the capture table fields into fast-moving (pricing, positioning, funding, new features) and slow-moving (target buyer, business model, category). Then give me: - A monthly refresh checklist that touches only the fast-moving fields and fits in 20 minutes. - 3 to 5 free alerts or feeds to set up now (changelogs, newsletters, job boards, review feeds, search alerts) with the exact terms to watch. - A rule for when the brief is stale enough to rebuild rather than patch. STEP 9 - HONESTY CHECK BEFORE YOU HAND IT OVER: List every number and claim in the brief that is not a FACT. For the three that matter most to the decision, give me the exact search string or page to open to confirm them. Then say in one line how much I should trust this brief as it stands. MY INPUTS Market, product or industry: [BE AS SPECIFIC AS YOU CAN] The decision I am trying to make: [OR WRITE NOT SURE AND MAKE ME PICK ONE] Who I think the customer is: [DESCRIBE OR WRITE UNKNOWN] Competitors I already know of: [LIST OR WRITE NONE] What I already have: [CUSTOMERS / WAITLIST / SALES CALLS / NOTHING YET] Hours I can spend on this: [NUMBER] Budget for tools and reports: [AMOUNT OR ZERO] Deadline: [DATE OR NONE] Start at Step 0. Ask your questions, then wait.
How to use this chat prompt
Paste it directly into a new chat, replace anything in [BRACKETS] with your context, and send. Re-use it whenever the task comes up, or save it as a text-expander snippet.
Example output
After naming the decision: whether to launch a subscription box for board-game accessories, with zero research budget.
Market Size: The subscription box industry is worth $15 billion.
Here are 40 competitors: [long list].
STEP 0: decision pinned, launch or don't launch by next month, based on whether 50 people would pre-order.
TRIAGE TEST: three questions to sort competitors in 15 seconds each, Tier 1 capped at 8 direct competitors, not 40.
BOTTOM-UP ESTIMATE: 200 reachable buyers in your existing community, times a 10 percent plausible conversion, times $25, equals $500 in month-one revenue. Marked ESTIMATE.
GAP: none of your Tier 1 competitors serve board-game accessories specifically, they're all general hobby boxes. That's your opening, or the niche genuinely doesn't want a dedicated box, worth testing with 5 pre-order messages first.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
What if I can't afford any paid research tools or reports?
Assumed zero budget by default. Every research move it gives you points at free sources only: company sites, job postings, reviews, forums, and public filings, never a paid database.
Will it just tell me a market size without a source?
No, it refuses to invent a market size, growth rate, or any other figure. Every number is either built bottom-up with the arithmetic shown or labeled as something you still need to look up.
Once I have the brief, how do I turn it into something a lender would actually read?
Feed the sourced numbers from this brief straight into build a loan-ready business plan from your real numbers, no hallucinated financials, so the plan's market section rests on the same labeled facts and estimates instead of a fresh guess.
What if this market turns out to already be well served by existing competitors?
It's built to say that plainly rather than force a fabricated opportunity. If the honest read is that you shouldn't enter, the one-page brief states that directly instead of talking around it.
Keep going
What's next
Prompt
Build a Loan-Ready Business Plan From Your Real Numbers (No Hallucinated Financials)
Interviews you for the actual numbers and facts of your business, then writes a tight, funder-ready business plan with financials that tie together - instead of a polished-but-generic template full of made-up figures that fall apart in a lender conversation. Get the market figures it needs from our market research prompt first, so nothing in that section is guessed. Once the numbers are real, our pricing strategy prompt is what turns them into a number you can defend to a lender.
Collection
AI Prompts for First-Time Founders
A generic AI business plan reads well and falls apart the moment a loan officer or investor asks how the numbers actually tie together, because the model filled every gap with plausible-sounding, made-up figures. These AI prompts for first-time founders work the other way around: the AI interviews you for your real numbers and facts first, then writes the plan around what you actually gave it.
Guide
Choosing the Right AI Tool for Your Task
There's no single best AI assistant, only better and worse fits for a specific job. Here are the six criteria that actually decide it, plus a fast test to confirm your pick.